SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) End-of-Life?

May 23, 2025

Microsoft’s focus on cloud-based platforms like Power BI, Azure Analysis Services, and Microsoft Fabric, prioritizing tabular models over multidimensional ones, has sparked concerns about the long-term viability of SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS). Should you be worried?

TABLE OF CONTENTS
AI-generated image of a road by Grok
Analytics
OLAP
Technology
Semantic

We’ve received inquiries from SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) users these recent years concerned about its long-term support within Microsoft’s SQL Server ecosystem. If SSAS is a critical part of your infrastructure, should you be worried? 

Below, we address these concerns, outline the current state of SSAS, and compare it with the alternatives Microsoft has been promoting.

SSAS supported in SQL Server 2022

SSAS remains a component of SQL Server 2022, continuing to be supported in SQL Server 2022, retaining its core capabilities for multidimensional analysis and MDX queries. While Microsoft has not officially announced an end-of-support date for SSAS, its strategic emphasis has clearly pivoted toward cloud-based platforms like Power BI, AAS and Fabric. This shift has fueled speculation in community forums about the long-term viability of SSAS, with users questioning whether SSAS is becoming outdated or nearing end-of-life.

As noted by industry expert Chris Webb, Microsoft’s strategic direction is increasingly centered around cloud-based analytical platforms. For SSAS Multidimensional users, there are no tools to fully convert multidimensional models into the newer tabular format. In such cases, organizations may opt to retain multidimensional models on-premises or run them in virtualized environments in the cloud.

Despite these changes, SSAS continues to be a supported solution for on-premises analytics. Based on community observations, innovation for it appears to have slowed, as well as some features, such as Data Mining, have been officially deprecated and are no longer supported. Organizations heavily invested in SSAS can continue using it while preparing for an eventual shift toward cloud-based or flexible platforms.

Comparing SSAS

The table below compares SSAS with Microsoft’s analytics platforms:

Platform Purpose Deployment Model Types Multidimensional Support Query Language Scalability
SSAS Enterprise-grade on-premises tool with multidimensional and tabular modeling On-premises or Azure VM Multidimensional & Tabular Yes (MDX) MDX (multidimensional), DAX (tabular) Manual (hardware-dependent)
AAS Managed cloud platform for scalable tabular models Cloud (Azure PaaS) Tabular No DAX, MDX via SSAS connection Auto-scale, pause/resume
Power BI Self-service BI with tabular model creation and analysis Cloud (SaaS) Tabular No (possible via SSAS connection) DAX, MDX via SSAS connection Limited (shared capacity)
Power BI Premium Enterprise BI with dedicated capacity for large-scale tabular models Cloud (SaaS, dedicated) Tabular No (possible via SSAS connection) DAX, MDX via SSAS connection High (dedicated, scale-out)
Microsoft Fabric Unified analytics platform for data integration and tabular model analysis Cloud (SaaS, unified) Tabular No (possible via SSAS connection) DAX, MDX via SSAS connection High (Lakehouse architecture)

Options for SSAS Multidimensional Models

Here are some options to maintain or complement your current model environment:

  1. Maintain SSAS On-Premises:
    1. Pros: Retains full MDX support, no changes to your model, integrates with existing tools.
    2. Cons: Requires on-premises infrastructure maintenance.
    3. Best For: Organizations with stable, effective multidimensional models.
  2. Run SSAS in Azure VM:
    1. Pros: Moves your model to the cloud without changes, supports MDX, maintains existing functionality.
    2. Cons: Requires VM management, potentially higher costs.
    3. Best For: Cloud hosting while preserving your multidimensional model.
  3. Explore Tabular Models for New Projects:
    1. Pros: Aligns with Microsoft’s cloud-based analytical platforms.
    2. Cons: No direct conversion from multidimensional models, necessitating manual redesign; lacks MDX’s complex features like named sets (dynamic dimension subsets), calculated members with custom rollups, or multidimensional calculations across multiple axes; learning curve for complex calculations compared to MDX; separate model management.
    3. Best For: Experimenting with modeling approaches aligned with Microsoft’s direction

Conclusion

While Microsoft’s focus on Azure Analysis Services, Power BI and Microsoft Fabric has raised questions about SSAS’s long-term role, creating a perception of risk and mixed signals among users, SQL Server Analysis Services remains supported in SQL Server 2022 and there is no official communication indicating an end of support. Organizations using SSAS can continue leveraging its strengths for on-premises analytics while exploring cloud-based options for future-proofing, noting that well-established, complex multidimensional models may be difficult or impractical to fully migrate.

References

You find our Articles Helpful?
Subscribe to our Newsletter to never miss One!